The Unraveling of Athletics South Africa: A Chronicle of Administrative Negligence

JEOPARDY: The author says that the recent deregistration of Athletics South Africa (ASA) tarnishes the reputation of South African athletics and jeopardises the careers of countless athletes who rely on the institution for guidance and support. Photo: Levi Saville

The recent deregistration of Athletics South Africa (ASA) by the Companies and Intellectual Property Commission (CIPC) has unveiled a disturbing narrative of administrative incompetence and negligence. This development tarnishes South African athletics’ reputation and jeopardises the careers of countless athletes who depend on these institutions for guidance and support.

ASA’s deregistration, as reported by Sunday World, stems from its failure to comply with statutory obligations, including the timely submission of annual returns . This blatant disregard for compliance has stripped ASA of its legal status, rendering all decisions and actions taken post-deregistration null and void. Such gross administrative negligence reflects a leadership that is either alarmingly incompetent or willfully indifferent to the foundational principles of governance.

The crisis extends beyond ASA, casting a shadow over its affiliates. Central Gauteng Athletics (CGA), a pivotal provincial body, has come under scrutiny regarding its registration status. While CGA maintains an online presence and facilitates athlete registrations through its platform, questions about its compliance with CIPC registration requirements remain unanswered. This ambiguity undermines CGA’s legitimacy and exposes it to legal and financial vulnerabilities, further destabilising the athletics framework in the region.

The administrative failures of ASA and potentially its affiliates have far-reaching financial implications. Sponsors who invest in these organisations expecting compliance and stability may reconsider their support, leading to a significant loss of funding for athletic programs. Moreover, the South African Revenue Service (SARS) mandates that entities receiving funds, especially those claiming tax-exempt status, be registered appropriately. Non-compliance could result in tax liabilities for the organisations and their sponsors, further eroding the financial foundation of South African athletics.

In light of these egregious administrative lapses, the Minister of Sport must exercise oversight authority to restore integrity within ASA and its affiliates. The South African Sports Confederation and Olympic Committee (SASCOC) Constitution obligates members to comply with national laws and uphold governance standards. Intervention measures may include placing ASA under administration or restructuring its leadership to ensure compliance and protect the interests of athletes.

The deregistration of ASA and the questionable status of its affiliates like CGA illuminate a profound governance crisis within South African athletics. This debacle not only contravenes constitutional mandates but also compromises the development and support of athletes. It is incumbent upon the relevant authorities to address these issues decisively, reinstating compliance and safeguarding the future of athletics in the nation.

Stan Itshegetseng is a person who registered Soweto Marathon Trust, a sports activist and a founder member of SATISCO dedicated to uncovering the intricacies of sports administration in South Africa. He writes in his personal capacity.

Author

RELATED TOPICS

Related Articles

African Times